Enhanced sensitivity of electrocorticography during awake craniotomy using a novel circular grid electrode.

PURPOSE: Awake craniotomy with intraoperative functional brain mapping (FBM) bedside neurological testing is an important technique used to optimize resective brain surgeries near eloquent cortex. Awake craniotomy performed with electrocorticography (ECoG) and direct electrical stimulation (DES) for FBM can delineate eloquent cortex from lesions and epileptogenic regions. However, current electrode technology demonstrates spatial limitations. Our group has developed a novel circular grid with the goal of improving spatial recording of ECoG to enhance detection of ictal and interictal activity. METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board at Mayo Clinic Florida. We analyzed patients undergoing awake craniotomy with ECoG and DES and compared ECoG data obtained using the 22 contact circular grid to standard 6 contact strip electrode. RESULTS: We included 144 cases of awake craniotomy with ECoG, 73 using circular grid and 71 with strip electrode. No significant differences were seen regarding preoperative clinical and demographic data, duration of ECoG recording (p = 0.676) and use of DES (p = 0.926). Circular grid was more sensitive in detecting periodic focal epileptiform discharges (PFEDs) (p = 0.004), PFEDs plus (p = 0.032), afterdischarges (ADs) per case (p = 0.022) at lower minimum (p = 0.012) and maximum (p < 0.0012) intensity stimulation, and seizures (p = 0.048). PFEDs (p < 0.001), PFEDs plus (p < 0.001), and HFOs (p < 0.001) but not ADs (p = 0.255) predicted electrographic seizures. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate higher sensitivity in detecting ictal and interictal activity on ECoG during awake craniotomy with a novel circular grid compared to strip electrode, likely due to better spatial sampling during ECoG. We also found association between PFEDs and intraoperative seizures.

The evolution of antiseizure medication therapy selection in adults: Is artificial intelligence -assisted antiseizure medication selection ready for prime time?

Antiseizure medications (ASMs) are the mainstay of symptomatic epilepsy treatment. The primary goal of pharmacotherapy with ASMs in epilepsy is to achieve complete seizure remission while minimizing therapy-related adverse events. Over the years, more ASMs have been introduced, with approximately 30 now in everyday use. With such a wide variety, much guidance is needed in choosing ASMs for initial therapy, subsequent replacement monotherapy, or adjunctive therapy. The specific ASMs are typically tailored by the patient's related factors, including epilepsy syndrome, age, sex, comorbidities, and ASM characteristics, including the spectrum of efficacy, pharmacokinetic properties, safety, and tolerability. Weighing these key clinical variables requires experience and expertise that may be limited. Furthermore, with this approach, patients may endure multiple trials of ineffective treatments before the most appropriate ASM is found. A more reliable way to predict response to different ASMs is needed so that the most effective and tolerated ASM can be selected. Soon, alternative approaches, such as deep machine learning (ML), could aid the individualized selection of the first and subsequent ASMs. The recognition of epilepsy as a network disorder and the integration of personalized epilepsy networks in future ML platforms can also facilitate the prediction of ASM response. Augmenting the conventional approach with artificial intelligence (AI) opens the door to personalized pharmacotherapy in epilepsy. However, more work is needed before these models are ready for primetime clinical practice.

Risk factors for preoperative and postoperative seizures in patients with glioblastoma according to the 2021 World Health Organization classification.

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for developing glioblastoma (GBM) related preoperative (PRS) and postoperative seizures (POS). Also, we aimed to analyze the impact of PRS and POS on survival in a GBM cohort according to the revised 2021 WHO glioma classification. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with GBM (according to the 2021 World Health Organization Classification) treated at Mayo Clinic Florida between January 2018 and July 2022. Seizures were stratified into preoperative seizures (PRS) and postoperative seizures (POS, >7 days after surgery). Associations between patients' characteristics and overall survival with PRS and POS were assessed. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen adults (mean =60.9 years), 49 (41.2 %) females, were identified. The rates of PRS and POS in the cohort were 35.3 % (n = 42) and 37.8 % (n = 45), respectively. Patients with PRS were younger (p = 0.035) and were likely to undergo intraoperative electrocorticography. The incidence of PRS (p = 0.049) and POS (p<0.001) was lower among patients with tumors located in the occipital location. PRS increased the risk of POS after adjusting for age and sex (RR: 2.59, CI = 1.44-4.65, p = 0.001). There was no association between PRS or POS and other patient-related factors, including several tumor molecular markers (TMMs) examined. PRS (p = 0.036), POS (p<0.001), and O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase (MGMT) promotor methylation status (p = 0.032) were associated with longer survival time. CONCLUSIONS: PRS and POS are associated with non-occipital tumor location and longer survival time in patients with GBM. While younger ages predicted PRS, PRS predicted POS. Well-designed prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed to clarify the influence of TMMs in the genesis of epileptic seizures in patients with GBM.

Intraoperative electrocorticography during laser-interstitial thermal therapy predicts seizure outcome in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRLiTT) for treating temporal lobe epilepsy has recently gained popularity. We aimed to investigate the predictive value of pre-and post-MRLiTT epileptiform discharges (EDs) on intraoperative electrocorticography (iECoG) in seizure outcomes for patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE). METHODS: We conducted a pilot, prospective single-center cohort study on seven consecutive patients with mTLE that underwent MRLiTT. Pre- and post-MRLiTT iECoG was performed using a 1x8 contact depth electrode along the same trajectory used for the laser catheter. RESULTS: The responders had a robust reduction in ED frequency compared to pre-MRLiTT iECoG (86% vs 13%, p < 0.01). Clinical characteristics, including risk factors for epilepsy, duration of epilepsy, presence of mesial temporal lobe sclerosis, prior intracranial monitoring, the absolute frequency of pre- or post-MRLiTT EDs, and ablation volume were not significantly associated with responder status. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first demonstration that intraoperative reduction in EDs during mesial temporal lobe MRLiTT may potentially predict seizure outcomes and may serve as an intraoperative biomarker for satisfactory ablation. However, larger prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings and evaluate the utility of iECoG during MRLiTT. SIGNIFICANCE: iECoG during mesial temporal lobe MRLiTT may help assess seizure outcomes.

Association of intracranial abnormalities with the development of epilepsy and drug-resistant epilepsy in patients with Parry-Romberg syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy represents an essential component of Parry Romberg syndrome (PRS). This study aimed to identify clinical factors that influence the development of epilepsy and drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) in PRS. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of eighty patients with PRS. Data including the age of onset for PRS, history of seizures, use and timing of immunotherapy, antiseizure medication use, and EEG and brain imaging findings were reviewed. For comparison with the patients with epilepsy (PRSe+) group, we selected 18 age and sex-matched controls from the patient without epilepsy (PRSe-) cohort using propensity score matching. RESULTS: Eighteen (22.5%) had epilepsy: 12 were female, and the median age was 14.5 years (range = 6-48 years). Eleven patients developed DRE. The median latency between the onset of cutaneous manifestations and diagnosis and timing and use of immunotherapy was similar between the PRSe + and PRSe- groups. Intracranial abnormalities were commonly seen in the PRSe + group (16 vs. 2, p < 0.01). White matter disease and ipsilateral atrophy were common among the PRSe + group. Timing and use of immunotherapy, epileptiform discharges, and brain imaging abnormalities did not differ between those with DRE and without. CONCLUSIONS: The presence and degree of severity of ipsilateral brain abnormalities are risk factors for the development of epilepsy in PRS but not factors in predicting drug resistance. The timing of immunotherapy did not influence the development of PRSe + or DRE. Prospective studies are needed to identify biomarkers for epilepsy and assess the role of immunotherapy on seizure outcomes in PRSe + .

Contemporary Neuroscience Core Curriculum for Medical Schools.

Medical students need to understand core neuroscience principles as a foundation for their required clinical experiences in neurology. In fact, they need a solid neuroscience foundation for their clinical experiences in all other medical disciplines also, because the nervous system plays such a critical role in the function of every organ system. Due to the rapid pace of neuroscience discoveries, it is unrealistic to expect students to master the entire field. It is also unnecessary, as students can expect to have ready access to electronic reference sources no matter where they practice. In the pre-clerkship phase of medical school, the focus should be on providing students with the foundational knowledge to use those resources effectively and interpret them correctly. This article describes an organizational framework for teaching the essential neuroscience background needed by all physicians. This is particularly germane at a time when many medical schools are re-assessing traditional practices and instituting curricular changes such as competency-based approaches, earlier clinical immersion, and increased emphasis on active learning. This article reviews factors that should be considered when developing the pre-clerkship neuroscience curriculum, including goals and objectives for the curriculum, the general topics to include, teaching and assessment methodology, who should direct the course, and the areas of expertise of faculty who might be enlisted as teachers or content experts. These guidelines were developed by a work group of experienced educators appointed by the Undergraduate Education Subcommittee (UES) of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN). They were then successively reviewed, edited, and approved by the entire UES, the AAN Education Committee, and the AAN Board of Directors.

Encephalocele-Associated Drug-Resistant Epilepsy of Adult Onset: Diagnosis, Management, and Outcomes.

Epileptogenic encephaloceles, most frequently located in the temporal lobe, are a known lesional cause of focal epilepsy. Data are limited regarding diagnosis, management, and outcomes of patients with epilepsy in the setting of an encephalocele, because the literature mostly comprises case reports, case series, and retrospective studies. We conducted a broad literature review for articles related to encephaloceles and epilepsy regardless of level of evidence. Hence, this review provides a summary of all available literature related to the topic. Thirty-six scientific reports that fulfilled our inclusion criteria were reviewed. Most reported patients presented with focal impaired awareness seizures and/or generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Although most of the encephaloceles were located in the temporal lobe, we found 5 cases of extratemporal encephaloceles causing epilepsy. More patients who underwent either lesionectomy or lobectomy were seizure free at time of follow-up. In the temporal lobe, there is no clear consensus on the appropriate management for epileptic encephaloceles and further studies are warranted to understand the associated factors and long-term outcomes associated with epilepsy secondary to encephaloceles. Reported data suggest that these patients could be manageable with surgical procedures including lesionectomy or lobectomy. In addition, because of data suggesting similar results between procedures, a more conservative surgery with lesionectomy and defect repair rather than a lobectomy may have lower surgical risks and similar seizure freedom.

Behavioral adverse events with brivaracetam, levetiracetam, perampanel, and topiramate: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: To understand the currently available post-marketing real-world evidence of the incidences of and discontinuations due to the BAEs of irritability, anger, and aggression in people with epilepsy (PWE) treated with the anti-seizure medications (ASMs) brivaracetam (BRV), levetiracetam (LEV), perampanel (PER), and topiramate (TPM), as well as behavioral adverse events (BAEs) in PWE switching from LEV to BRV. METHODS: A systematic review of published literature using the Cochrane Library, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Embase was performed to identify retrospective and prospective observational studies reporting the incidence of irritability, anger, or aggression with BRV, LEV, PER, or TPM in PWE. The incidences of these BAEs and the rates of discontinuation due to each were categorized by ASM, and where possible, weighted means were calculated but not statistically assessed. Behavioral and psychiatric adverse events in PWE switching from LEV to BRV were summarized descriptively. RESULTS: A total of 1500 records were identified in the searches. Of these, 44 published articles reporting 42 studies met the study criteria and were included in the data synthesis, 7 studies were identified in the clinical trial database, and 5 studies included PWE switching from LEV to BRV. Studies included a variety of methods, study populations, and definitions of BAEs. While a wide range of results was reported across studies, weighted mean incidences were 5.6% for BRV, 9.9% for LEV, 12.3% for PER, and 3.1% for TPM for irritability; 3.3%* for BRV, 2.5% for LEV, 2.0% for PER, and 0.2%* for TPM for anger; and 2.5% for BRV, 2.6% for LEV, 4.4% for PER, and 0.5%* for TPM for aggression. Weighted mean discontinuation rates were 0.8%* for BRV, 3.4% for LEV, 3.0% for PER, and 2.2% for TPM for irritability and 0.8%* for BRV, 2.4% for LEV, 9.2% for PER, and 1.2%* for TPM for aggression. There were no discontinuations for anger. Switching from LEV to BRV led to improvement in BAEs in 33.3% to 83.0% of patients (weighted mean, 66.6%). *Denotes only 1 study. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review characterizes the incidences of irritability, anger, and aggression with BRV, LEV, PER, and TPM, and it provides robust real-world evidence demonstrating that switching from LEV to BRV may improve BAEs. While additional data remain valuable due to differences in methodology (which make comparisons difficult), these results improve understanding of the real-world incidences of discontinuations due to these BAEs in clinical practice and can aid in discussions and treatment decision-making with PWE.

Migraine Prophylaxis Using Novel Monoclonal Antibody Injections in a Commercial Pilot.

BACKGROUND: Frequent migraine headaches are disabling and aeromedically disqualifying. Four new monoclonal antibody medications, targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) since 2018, with more expected in the coming years. These medications present new alternatives for the treatment of migraine unresponsive to other therapeutic and prophylactic agents.CASE REPORT: We present a case of a 45-yr-old commercial pilot who presented with migraine headaches increasing in frequency to 1315 per month in spite of the use of propranolol for prophylaxis and sumatriptan for abortive treatment of the headaches. Upon presentation, he was not flying due to his frequent headaches and he was started on monthly subcutaneous injections of fremanezumab. Following his second injection, his headaches stopped entirely, and he has continued on the medication and not experienced another migraine headache. He underwent an aeromedical neurology evaluation and consideration for Authorization of Special Issuance of Medical Certificate, which was granted by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).DISCUSSION: This is the first case to our knowledge of the successful use of an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody medication in an active pilot. The pilot appears to be a super responder to the medication, having achieved complete remission of a nearly life-long condition. Though only a small portion of treated individuals will see this sort of response, these medications represent an effective additional option for migraine prophylaxis in the pilot population.Garber MA, Sirven JI, Roth RS, Hemphill JM. Migraine prophylaxis using novel monoclonal antibody injections in a commercial pilot. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2020; 91(10):824825.

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus secondary to acute porphyria crisis.

Both variegate and acute intermittent porphyria can manifest with various neurological symptoms. Although acute symptomatic seizures have been previously described, they are typically tonic-clonic and focal impaired awareness seizures. Convulsive status epilepticus and epilepsia partialis continua are rare and have been described on a case report basis. To our knowledge, there are no previously reported cases describing non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) with electroencephalogram (EEG) documentation in the setting of acute porphyria crisis. We report a unique presentation of NCSE, which resolved after administering levetiracetam in a patient with variegate porphyria, without a known seizure disorder.

Innovative approaches reaching underserved and rural communities to improve epilepsy care: A review of the methodology of the Connectors Project.

OBJECTIVE: The Connectors Project, a collaboration between the Epilepsy Foundation and UCB Pharma, was a multiyear project designed to improve epilepsy care in underserved communities. A core objective of the Connectors Project was to pilot new and innovative approaches to epilepsy awareness and education in rural and underserved areas, including standardized curricula for healthcare providers and patients. METHODS: A series of consensus conferences explored opportunities and barriers to epilepsy care throughout the United States including access to local Epilepsy Foundations, neurologists, and epilepsy centers. Data from QuintilesIMS™ were examined for access to newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs)-a proxy for quality of epilepsy care-in different regions. State factors (e.g., local epilepsy foundation office, access to newer vs. older AEDs, and geographic density and diversity) were used in selecting four states as examples of rural and underserved areas to pilot the awareness and educational programs. For each state, a work team assessed challenges and opportunities, tailored educational curricula, and developed strategies for effective delivery of the educational programs. Interventions were held between June 2016 and June 2017. Interventions consisted of outreach and awareness programs, in-person health education to healthcare providers and patients/families, and digital health education. RESULTS: Michigan, Nevada, Oklahoma, and West Virginia were identified as pilot states representing geographically diverse areas, ranging from a state with a large high-density population center with several epilepsy centers and a local Epilepsy Foundation office (Michigan) to a state with predominately rural areas and a few small urban cores, two epilepsy centers, and no in-state Epilepsy Foundation office (West Virginia). State work teams tailored interventions and examined options for type, intent, ease of use, and impact. All states implemented outreach and awareness initiatives and in-person health education for patients and healthcare providers; use of digital health education was variable. Measurement of the interventions was agreed to be performed by the use of patient and physician surveys and reevaluation of data from QuintilesIMS for access to newer AEDs. CONCLUSION: Local Epilepsy Foundation offices successfully connected healthcare providers in rural and underserved areas to epilepsy education designed to enhance quality care in epilepsy. Educational opportunities for people with epilepsy and their families addressed critical gaps in accessing quality epilepsy care and self-management. Tailored and innovative educational approaches can be used to increase awareness levels and to overcome geographic challenges in reaching underserved populations. Relationship building and repeated, consistent engagement with healthcare providers and patients can assist in improving communication and self-management skills among patients with epilepsy.

"Is there a neurologist on this flight?": An update.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Neurologists are being asked to offer their services in response to in-flight medical conditions. This review updates the latest understanding of how neurologists should manage in-flight neurologic emergencies should they be called upon to serve. A review of the existing literature was conducted for sharing of best practices in this unique scenario. RECENT FINDINGS: In-flight neurologic emergencies are on the rise. This article provides a synthesis of current best practices for in-flight emergencies including epidemiology, airline responsibility, available health care equipment on jetliners, legal ramifications of helping, and pathophysiology of why in-flight neurologic emergencies are so common. SUMMARY: In-flight neurologic emergencies are common and all physicians are increasingly being asked to respond to in-flight emergencies. Understanding one's responsibility, available equipment, and how to best prevent these scenarios with one's own patients may help to make this complex situation more manageable.

Diagnostic utility of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form in the epilepsy monitoring unit: Considering sex differences.

Psychological assessment measures are frequently used to evaluate patients in epilepsy monitoring units. One goal of that assessment is to contribute information that may help with differential diagnosis between epilepsy and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) is one such measure. Del Bene et al. (2017) recently published an analysis that was the first to compare MMPI-2-RF scale elevations between diagnostic groups stratified by sex. The purpose of the present study was to replicate that analysis in a larger sample. Similar to previous work, we found that both men and women with PNES were more likely than men and women with epilepsy to report high levels of somatic complaints (2 to 5 times greater odds of somatic symptom reporting) and a variety of types of complaints. Mood disturbance scales were not significantly elevated in our PNES sample. Results contribute to the small body of research on sex differences in patients with PNES and suggest that somatization is a key characterization across sexes.

Usage of EpiFinder clinical decision support in the assessment of epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of epilepsy is at times elusive for both neurologists and nonneurologists, resulting in delays in diagnosis and therapy. The development of screening methods has been identified as a priority in response to this diagnostic and therapeutic gap. EpiFinder is a novel clinical decision support tool designed to enhance the process of information gathering and integration of patient/proxy respondent data. It is designed specifically to take key terms from a patient's history and incorporate them into a heuristic algorithm that dynamically produces differential diagnoses of epilepsy syndromes. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to test the usability and diagnostic accuracy of the clinical decision support application EpiFinder in an adult population. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients were prospectively identified upon admission to the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU) for episode classification from January through June of 2017. Based on semiologic input, the application generates a list of epilepsy syndromes. The EpiFinder-generated diagnosis for each subject was compared to the final diagnosis obtained via continuous video electroencephalogram (cVEEG) monitoring. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients had habitual events recorded during their EMU stay. A diagnosis of epilepsy was confirmed (with cVEEG monitoring) in 26 patients while 27 patients were found to have a diagnosis other than epilepsy. The algorithm appropriately predicted differentiation between the presence of an epilepsy syndrome and an alternative diagnosis with 86.8% (46/53 participants) accuracy. EpiFinder correctly identified the presence of epilepsy with a sensitivity of 86.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 65.0-97.1) and specificity of 85.1% (95% CI: 70.2-96.4). CONCLUSION: The initial testing of the EpiFinder algorithm suggests possible utility in differentiating between an epilepsy syndrome and an alternative diagnosis in adult patients.

Current state of the union of epilepsy care in the United States: Antiepileptic drugs - An introduction to the Connectors Project.

PURPOSE: How antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are used in the United States (US) is one proxy public health indicator for the current state of epilepsy management. The use of phenytoin, other older AEDs, and newer AEDs may act as an indicator for the quality of epilepsy practice in addition to the current American Academy of Neurology quality measures. Data on AED used by states and populations can help identify which public health interventions are necessary to improve the status of epilepsy care. The Connectors Project, a collaboration between the Epilepsy Foundation and UCB Pharma, is a multiyear project designed to improve epilepsy awareness and management in underserved communities. The objective of the first phase of the Connectors Project was to assess geographic variation in epilepsy care and identify locations in need of improved epilepsy care by initially evaluating AED use in the US. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional administrative claim analysis was conducted using the QuintilesIMS™ database which included US longitudinal retail prescription and office medical claims data. Patients with a confirmed epilepsy diagnosis who were prescribed AEDs were identified. Patients with an AED prescription over a 3-year period from January 2013 to December 2015 were included if they had an epilepsy diagnosis in the 2-year period before their first AED prescription in the reporting period. The percentages of patients initially prescribed phenytoin, other older AEDs (carbamazepine and valproate), and newer AEDs (eslicarbazepine, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, topiramate) were calculated and stratified by US state and Washington, DC. Patients were considered newly treated if they had an epilepsy diagnosis code and had not received an epilepsy drug in the 1-year period preceding the first AED prescription in the reporting period. Data are reported using the moving annual total ending December 2015. RESULTS: Approximately 2.5 million US patients with epilepsy and their AED prescriptions were identified from 2013 to 2015. Predictably, states with the largest population had the highest number of patients with epilepsy who were prescribed an AED, including California, Texas, Florida, and New York. Regions with the highest total proportion of phenytoin use with a low proportion of newer AED use were Mississippi (24.4% and 53.1%, respectively) and Washington, DC (24.7% and 58.1%). Montana had the lowest proportion of phenytoin use with the highest proportion of newer AED use (7.9% and 70.4%). Among newly treated patients (N=237,347), Hawaii (39.1%) and Alaska (38.8%) had the highest percentage of phenytoin use compared with all other states. Idaho (86.1%) and Montana (84.4%) had the highest proportion of newer AED use. Washington, DC (50.9%) and Hawaii (60.9%) had the lowest proportion of patients treated with newer AEDs. North Dakota (29.6%) and Washington, DC (27.9%) had the highest rates of other older AEDs use. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of newly treated US patients with epilepsy are underserved regarding newer AED use with Mississippi and Washington, DC having the highest proportion of phenytoin use relative to newer AED use. Understanding the socioeconomic and demographic barriers for these observations is essential in planning interventions to improve the quality of life and care for patients with epilepsy, including newly treated patients. These data provide a baseline to target educational and clinical interventions for improving the quality of US epilepsy care.

Awake Surgery for Brain Vascular Malformations and Moyamoya Disease.

OBJECTIVE: Although a significant amount of experience has accumulated for awake procedures for brain tumor, epilepsy, and carotid surgery, its utility for intracranial neurovascular indications remains largely undefined. Awake surgery for select neurovascular cases offers the advantage of precise brain mapping and robust neurologic monitoring during surgery for lesions in eloquent areas, avoidance of potential hemodynamic instability, and possible faster recovery. It also opens the window for perilesional epileptogenic tissue resection with potentially less risk for iatrogenic injury. METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained for a retrospective review of awake surgeries for intracranial neurovascular indications over the past 36 months from a prospectively maintained quality database. We reviewed patients' clinical indications, clinical and imaging parameters, and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Eight consecutive patients underwent 9 intracranial neurovascular awake procedures conducted by the senior author. A standardized "sedated-awake-sedated" protocol was used in all 8 patients. For the 2 patients with arteriovenous malformations and the 3 patients with cavernoma, awake brain surface and white matter mapping was performed before and during microsurgical resection. A neurological examination was obtained periodically throughout all 5 procedures. There were no intraoperative or perioperative complications. Hypotension was avoided during the 2 Moyamoya revascularization procedures in the patient with a history of labile blood pressure. Postoperative imaging confirmed complete arteriovenous malformation and cavernoma resections. No new neurologic deficits or new-onset seizures were noted on 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Awake surgery appears to be safe for select patients with intracranial neurovascular pathologies. Potential advantages include greater safety, shorter length of stay, and reduced cost.